home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: clamage@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Clamage)
- Message-ID: <4id599$i3t@engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM>
- X-Original-Date: 16 Mar 1996 01:24:57 GMT
- Path: in2.uu.net!bounce-back
- Date: 16 Mar 96 10:18:40 GMT
- Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Conforming compilers should compile STL?
- Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc., Mountain View, CA
- References: <QQahcw08893.199603150939@relay2.UU.NET>
- X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #21 (NOV)
- X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++
- iQBFAgUBMUqVi+EDnX0m9pzZAQH2CQF/XGjxpnNfSE8+aP9hx2jrbdianzUjV5hz
- Xpw93aC7D3uivDCfljJUKZUkxu+GpFzk
- =qYFi
-
- mslamm@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il (Zvi Lamm) writes:
-
- >What version of the STL source is going to be in the standard?
-
- None of the currently-available versions of STL are identical
- to what is in the draft C++ standard. The final version of STL
- will probably require features that few, if any, C++ compilers
- currently support. Versions of STL reasonably close to what will
- be the standard are currently available (for popular compilers)
- from several sources, some commercial, some free. By "reasonably
- close" I mean that code using those versions of STL probably
- will not need to be changed when compiled against standard-
- conforming C++ libraries when those become available. (The
- C++ Standard is not yet complete, so no implementation can
- accurately claim to be conforming.)
- --
- Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage@eng.sun.com
- ---
- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles: try just posting with ]
- [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
- [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]
- [ Policy: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html ]
- [ Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu ]
-